Scoring Rubric
Criteria
- ADDRESSES NEED Addresses
unique and/or critical community need(s)
- BOLD Offers
creative and/or bold ideas in response to community need(s)
- REACH IS WIDE OR DEEP Project
touches the lives of many historically underserved LGBTQ+ older people and/or offers intensive support to small group of LGBTQ+ older people who have been historically underserved
- REPRESENTATIVE LEADERSHIP Engages
(or has clear plan to engage) marginalized LGBTQ+ older people in meaningful,
mutually-beneficial, and trust-based ways
- ENGAGING Offers a dynamic range of activities for community involvement
- FEASIBLE Presents
project goals and activities that are feasible given the time and funds
available during the grant period
- SPECIFIC Describes a project that is specific, as illustrated by a project plan with tasks, staff leads, and goals tied to a timeline
Scoring
Applications can receive up to 10 points for each criteria above. The maximum number of points an application can receive is 60 points.
- 1 POINT - Does
not provide enough details or offer a focused response that addresses the grant
priorities or objectives of the specific rubric criteria.
- 3 POINTS - Provides
some interesting details but does not provide enough focus or clarity in addressing the specific
rubric criteria. Does not make connections between needs, project activities, and expected outcomes.
- 6 POINTS - Provides thorough details and is focused but does not clearly or consistently. Offers some connections between needs, project activities, and expected outcomes. Does not necessarily
connect current project with long-term vision.
- 10 POINTS- Provides thorough details is focused. Consistently and clearly explains how activities address needs and lead
to expected outcomes. Additionally, offers insights about how the project will help fulfill long-term vision.
Panelist Recommendations
Guided but not limited by the funding priorities and scoring system above, three panelists will make one of the following recommendations as part of their collective decision making.
1) ______ I am in support of awarding grant funding to this project.
2) ______ I am in support of awarding grant funding to this project, pending more information about or changes to _________________.
3) ______ I am not in support of awarding grant funding to this project at present.